Legends of the Jedi › Forums › The Brainstormtorium › Contract

Deprecated: Function bp_core_get_user_domain is deprecated since version 12.0.0! Use bp_members_get_user_url() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Deprecated: Function seems_utf8 is deprecated since version 6.9.0! Use wp_is_valid_utf8() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Deprecated: Function seems_utf8 is deprecated since version 6.9.0! Use wp_is_valid_utf8() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
This topic has 12 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by Slyth.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
    • Anastasius Member
      February 18, 2009 at 6:37 am #1002

      First off this is not an original idea. This is a command in fote.

      Contract and Showcontract
      Contract would be sued to add coded backing to private bountys and also help fulfill the the help private bounty requirements.

      It would be simple say I wanted to hire lydor to perm walldo for 10k
      contract lydor walldo 10000
      it would do a check to make sure I have walldos dub and 10k

      Lydor can then showcontract to check his personal contracts and also he only gets payed when he does the perm.
      This will also allow claimbounty to be used in private bountys.

    • Troll Participant
      April 12, 2009 at 6:11 pm #9747

      I recall seeing a suggestion similiar to this around these forums.. *begins to look around*

    • Rojan QDel Member
      April 12, 2009 at 8:35 pm #9748

      I’m not sure, I like the risk involved in private bounties…

    • Anastasius Member
      April 12, 2009 at 9:10 pm #9749

      It would still carry risk, it would just code enforce the "You have to have there dub" rule

    • Drel Member
      April 16, 2009 at 12:00 am #9771
      "Rojan QDel":ql7bl7yt wrote:
      I’m not sure, I like the risk involved in private bounties…[/quote:ql7bl7yt]
      While +1, if this WERE implemented, I demand a "no disintegration" argument. Well, specific conditions, regardless: ground (for proof via armor, etc.), any means necessary, or captured alive, maybe?
    • Inactive
      July 17, 2009 at 9:41 pm #10484

      If there needs to be proof, just make it where you have to bring back an ear.

    • Drel Member
      July 18, 2009 at 1:02 am #10485
      "Skiia":w1cnuut9 wrote:
      If there needs to be proof, just make it where you have to bring back an ear.[/quote:w1cnuut9]
      What about more… private apendages?
    • Slyth Member
      October 28, 2009 at 11:20 pm #12251

      I agree with the skill completely. it doesn’t take away risk, it could even add some, like, if you don’t do the contract, the one who placed the contract could terminate it, but the hunter wouldn’t see it as terminated, then they could hire a different hunter, creating more havoc IC. would be nice to know you get the credits for killing too, and proof is easy, you already show proof that it is done, so that shouldn’t even be an issue.

    • Anastasius Member
      October 29, 2009 at 1:28 am #12201

      Exactly the whole point is just to add code backing behind private bountys. Enforce help private bounty.

    • Inactive
      October 29, 2009 at 2:34 am #12203

      Or we could just get rid of private bounties.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.