Deprecated: Function bp_core_get_user_domain is deprecated since version 12.0.0! Use bp_members_get_user_url() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
Deprecated: Function seems_utf8 is deprecated since version 6.9.0! Use wp_is_valid_utf8() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
Deprecated: Function seems_utf8 is deprecated since version 6.9.0! Use wp_is_valid_utf8() instead. in /home/lotj/www/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
-
-
September 22, 2008 at 12:44 pm #799
Expanding on the idea of alliance, this channel, which would be accessible to any character in a clan, would allow communication between allied clans without the ‘clanmessage’ empowerment. Clans still have their individual ‘clan’ channels, but this one, which doesn’t require an empowerment, would remove the necessity to nag a superior into clanmessaging say… an engineering corp to place an order or confirm their identity.
-
September 22, 2008 at 11:49 pm #5831
I have to agree with Csilla here. It’s a good idea, but the amount of coding involved to bring this idea to fruition doesn’t justify the ends. We accomplish the same with a comlink, and I like the idea that some channels can be broken into simply by stealing a comlink.
-
September 23, 2008 at 3:20 am #5822"Anna":9vhy4uk5 wrote:I have to agree with Csilla here. It’s a good idea, but the amount of coding involved to bring this idea to fruition doesn’t justify the ends. We accomplish the same with a comlink, and I like the idea that some channels can be broken into simply by stealing a comlink.[/quote:9vhy4uk5]
I’ve been screaming to make clan breachable forever and a day, and now you’re telling me you like channels being penetrable?
-
September 24, 2008 at 10:44 pm #7831
Clan is supposed to be a secure channel that can’t be breached without being in the clan and having a spyapp.
For anything else, the commnet really should be used.
-